|Statement||Dennis W. Carlton, Gustavo E. Bamberger, Roy J. Epstein.|
|Series||NBER working paper series -- working paper no. 4998, Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research) -- working paper no. 4998.|
|Contributions||Bamberger, Gustavo, 1960-, Epstein, Roy J. 1954-, National Bureau of Economic Research.|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||35, 2 p. :|
|Number of Pages||35|
Downloadable (with restrictions)! In , the U.S. Justice Department's Antitrust Division accused MIT and the Ivy League schools of fixing prices. The schools claimed that their cooperative behavior enabled them to concentrate financial aid on needy students and did not affect price. We analyze the empirical determinants of tuition and find no evidence that the . Antitrust law, or competition law (as it is known in Europe), regulates markets with the goal of protecting competition and thus increasing efficiency and consumer welfare. These laws are relevant to libraries for two reasons: (1) antitrust enforcement is often suggested as a solution for the problems of the scholarly publishing market, and (2) the specter of antitrust violations often . Keywords Competition law and higher education institutions Universities as undertakings Higher education and research as economic activities Services of general economic interest Framework for state aid for research and development Anti-competitive practices of higher education institutions Price fixing of tuition fees General Block Exemption Regulation Cited by: 6. The transformation is reliant on a level of debt that is rarely seen in higher education, and a Businessweek article pointed out that Moody’s downgraded High Point bonds to junk status after the university borrowed $ million. That same article included the factoid that High Point paid nearly $1 million annually to a public relations.
COVID Resources. Reliable information about the coronavirus (COVID) is available from the World Health Organization (current situation, international travel).Numerous and frequently-updated resource results are available from this ’s WebJunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle . Downloadable! In , the Antitrust Division sued MIT and the eight schools in the Ivy League under Section 1 of the Sherman Act for engaging in a conspiracy to fix the prices that students pay. The Antitrust Division claimed that the schools conspired on financial aid policies in an effort to reduce aid and raise their revenues. The schools justified their cooperative behavior by . Antitrust and Higher Education: Was There a Conspiracy to Restrict Financial Aid? Dennis W. Carlton, Gustavo E. Bamberger, Roy J. Epstein. NBER Working Paper No. Issued in January NBER Program(s):Industrial Organization ProgramCited by: Discover the best Antitrust Law in Best Sellers. Find the top most popular items in Amazon Books Best Sellers.
Since then, and in part as a result of the influence of the first edition, the antitrust field has been largely, although not completely, transformed into a body of economically rational principles consistent with the ideas set forth in the book. Today's antitrust professionals disagree on specific practices and rules, but most litigators Cited by: And early action is flat, according to numbers from Naviance. Black and Latino applicants are less likely to apply early than are Asians and whites. Common App figures point to fears about this year's totals. ACT disputes the findings. And political climate seen as contributing to national boom in law school applications. The role of antitrust law and regulation in ensuring the public policy objectives of Higher Education: Some thoughts on the UK and US Higher Education Markets Theodosia Stavroulaki I. Abstract European Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have increasingly been urged to move towards market Size: KB. Get this from a library! Antitrust and higher education: was there a conspiracy to restrict financial aid?. [Dennis W Carlton; Gustavo Bamberger; Roy J Epstein; National Bureau of Economic Research.] -- Abstract: In , the Antitrust Division sued MIT and the eight schools in the Ivy League under Section 1 of the Sherman Act for engaging in a conspiracy to fix the prices that .